Can-am Ryker 900 vs Kymco Cv3
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Can-am Ryker 900
Kymco Cv3
Horsepower (hp)
82 hp
60 hp
Torque (Nm)
85 Nm
55 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
175 km/h
180 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
296 kg
280 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
82 hp @ 7,500 rpm
~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released)
Torque
85 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
~55 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; official specs not fully released)
Top Speed
175 km/h (estimated; note: BRP does not officially publish a top speed figure)
~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production)
Weight
296 kg (curb weight)
~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
~5.0 L/100km (estimated, based on engine class; official figures not published for production model)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Can-am Ryker 900
7.5/10
"Solid used buy if you know exactly what it is."
Pros
+Rotax twin pulls strong
+CVT nearly maintenance-free
+Tilting front end surprises
Cons
−Wide footprint limits lane filtering
−Bodywork replacement costs sting
−Not a real motorcycle
Kymco Cv3
6.8/10
"A clever used bargain if the front suspension checks out clean."
Pros
+Leaning front end genuinely works
+Strong new-price depreciation
+Practical all-weather commuter
Cons
−Thin parts and dealer network
−Front suspension inspection critical
−Styling divides opinion sharply