Can-am Ryker 600 vs Kymco Cv3
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Can-am Ryker 600 vs Kymco Cv3. Can-am Ryker 600: 50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated) hp, 294 kg (curb weight) weight, top speed 145 km/h (estimated), Motoryk rating 7.0/10. Kymco Cv3: ~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released) hp, ~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed) weight, top speed ~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production), Motoryk rating 6.8/10.
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Can-am Ryker 600
Kymco Cv3
Horsepower (hp)
50 hp
60 hp
Torque (Nm)
54 Nm
55 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
145 km/h
180 km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
294 kg
280 kg
Type
Scooter
Scooter
Horsepower
50 hp @ 8,500 rpm (estimated)
~60 hp @ 7,500 rpm (estimated based on 550cc parallel-twin; official specs not fully released)
Torque
54 Nm @ 6,500 rpm (estimated)
~55 Nm @ 6,000 rpm (estimated; official specs not fully released)
Top Speed
145 km/h (estimated)
~180 km/h (estimated; official figure not confirmed for production)
Weight
294 kg (curb weight)
~280 kg (estimated wet/curb weight; official figure not confirmed)
Fuel
5.5 L/100km (estimated real-world average)
~5.0 L/100km (estimated, based on engine class; official figures not published for production model)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Can-am Ryker 600
7.0/10
"A genuinely capable machine, but buy it for what it is."
Pros
+Nearly impossible to tip over
+Rotax triple pulls strong
+Parts and service widely available
Cons
−CVT kills engagement completely
−Steering learning curve is real
−Belt wear gets expensive fast
Kymco Cv3
6.8/10
"A clever used bargain if the front suspension checks out clean."
Pros
+Leaning front end genuinely works
+Strong new-price depreciation
+Practical all-weather commuter
Cons
−Thin parts and dealer network
−Front suspension inspection critical
−Styling divides opinion sharply
Top 10 Accessories
Picks that work on either bike.
