Bmw G 310 Gs vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
Side-by-side comparison for used motorcycle buyers
Performance at a Glance
Green = winner per metric · Bars are relative to the higher value
Bmw G 310 Gs
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
Horsepower (hp)
34 hp
40 hp
Torque (Nm)
28 Nm
40 Nm
Top Speed (km/h)
143 km/h
— km/h
Weight (kg) — lower is better
170 kg
196 kg
Type
Adventure
Adventure
Horsepower
34 hp @ 9,500 rpm
40 hp @ 8,000 rpm
Torque
28 Nm @ 7,500 rpm
40 Nm @ 5,500 rpm
Top Speed
143 km/h
approx. 170 km/h (estimated; Royal Enfield does not officially publish top speed)
Weight
170 kg (wet/curb weight)
196 kg (wet/curb weight)
Fuel
3.0 L/100km or approximately 33 km/L (typical real-world average)
approx. 3.5–4.0 L/100km (25–28 km/L typical real-world average)
Fairing
Yes
Yes
Individual Reviews
Bmw G 310 Gs
6.5/10
"Great learner adventure bike if you find it priced right."
Pros
+Lightweight and easy handling
+Genuine light off-road capability
+Low seat height option
Cons
−Overpriced on used market
−Buzzy above 70mph
−Underpowered for two-up
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450
7.8/10
"The best Himalayan yet, and used prices make it irresistible."
Pros
+Sherpa engine genuinely impressive
+Capable suspension, no complaints
+Useful TFT navigation system
Cons
−Early software bugs persist
−Cramped for taller riders
−Parts availability still patchy